Trump v. Colorado: Colorado High Court Decision in Gorsuch’s Hands

Insights from White Collar Criminal Defense Attorneys Trusted Nationwide

Trump v. Colorado: Colorado High Court Decision in Gorsuch’s Hands

By: Ronald W. Chapman II

Colorado Supreme Court Ousts Trump from 2024 Primary Ballot

Against the weight of prior decisions in Michigan, Arizona and other States holding that Trump may remain on the ballot the Colorado Supreme Court blazes its own trail removing Trump from the 2024 Primary Ballot.

Trump Facing Ballot Scrutiny After the January 6th Insurrection. Trump Facing Ballot Scrutiny After the January 6th Insurrection.[/caption]

Opinion Can be Accessed Here

After a five day trial, the Supreme Court of Colorado’s decision addresses the eligibility of former President Donald J. Trump to appear on the Colorado Republican presidential primary ballot for 2024. The key legal question revolves around the application of Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which concerns disqualification from holding office due to engagement in insurrection.

The court found that President Trump engaged in insurrection on January 6, 2021, thereby making him ineligible under Section Three to hold presidential office. However, they also concluded that Section Three is self-executing and doesn’t require Congress to pass implementing legislation for its disqualification provision – a question most believe should be left up to a Federal Court.

Ultimately the Colorado Supreme Court held that President Trump is disqualified from holding the office of President under Section Three, and therefore, it would be unlawful to list him as a candidate on the primary ballot. The court’s decision reflects a strict interpretation of constitutional law, emphasizing the importance of upholding constitutional standards and disqualifying candidates who have engaged in insurrection.

 

On a Fast Track to SCOTUS – Trump has the Votes But with One Twist

The case is now on the fast track to the Supreme Court of the United States with a deadline of January 4th before the order goes into effect. SCOTUS is sure to reject Colorado’s logic. First, SCOTUS is unlikely to engage in blatant election interference – even if it lacked a conservative majority.

Second, there are too many procedural issues in brining this case to overlook. First, Colorado electors lack standing. Second, this is a political question that has been resolved by Congress. Third, most Courts agree that the 14th Amendment does not apply to POTUS because he is not an “officer” and did not swear the same oath. This, ironically, was a legal theory that many laughed at but was ultimately upheld by several State Supreme Courts.

Colorado’s decision simply will not stand which will make for an interesting Supreme Court term.

The more interesting story is what will happen from here. First, Trump will appeal to SCOTUS. Justice Gorsuch is the 10th Circuit’s justice, meaning he will have the ability to rule on pending motions – including the ability to grant a Stay. Justice Gorsuch can grant the application for a stay on his own or send it to the full bench in which case at least five would need to grant a stay.

SCOTUS does not like being forced to act quickly and it will not have briefing and argument by January 4th which means Gorsuch will grant the stay or he will ensure he has the votes from the full bench – which he does (Thomas, Roberts, Barrett, Gorsuch, Cavanaugh).

Having stayed the case and preventing removal from the ballot, Trump may very well appear on the ballot without full briefing on the issue.

About the Author

Ronald Chapman II is the founder of Chapman, Dowling & Mallek and a top-rated Michigan federal criminal defense attorney who represents clients in federal courts nationwide. His practice is focused on defending individuals and organizations in complex federal prosecutions, including white-collar criminal matters and healthcare fraud investigations.

Throughout his career, Mr. Chapman has helped clients avoid more than $550 million in potential penalties, primarily in cases involving physicians, healthcare providers, executives, and professionals facing federal charges. He is widely recognized for his work as a Michigan healthcare fraud defense attorney, as well as for his results in white collar criminal defense in Michigan, where cases often involve parallel civil, regulatory, and criminal exposure.

Ronald Chapman II Federal criminal defense Attorney
Tags
Hospice Fraud Defense: CMS and Medicare Target Hospice in National Takedown

Apr-8-2026

Hospice Fraud Defense: CMS and Medicare Target Hospice in National Takedown

Hospice fraud is a serious enforcement priority for Medicare, and federal regulators are under pressure...

What Really Happens at a Federal Criminal Appeal? Inside a Recent Oral Argument

Apr-2-2026

What Really Happens at a Federal Criminal Appeal? Inside a Recent Oral Argument

In federal court, some of the most important battles happen after trial—on appeal—where the focus...

After Dismissal of the Most Serious Counts, Remaining FDA Criminal Charges Result in Mixed Verdict for Dr. Sanjeev Kumar

Jan-9-2026

After Dismissal of the Most Serious Counts, Remaining FDA Criminal Charges Result in Mixed Verdict for Dr. Sanjeev Kumar

Memphis, Tennessee – The verdict returned this week in United States v. Sanjeev Kumar closed...

Dr. Parker’s Pill Mill Case Reaches the Supreme Court: Implications for Healthcare & White Collar Criminal Defense

Dec-31-2025

Dr. Parker’s Pill Mill Case Reaches the Supreme Court: Implications for Healthcare & White Collar Criminal Defense

Dr. Lonnie Joseph Parker, a Texarkana physician, was recently convicted in federal court of unlawfully...

Headquartered in Detroit, Michigan

Serving Clients Nationwide.

Chapman, Dowling & Mallek is headquartered in Detroit, Michigan and represents clients in federal investigations and criminal matters across the United States. Our attorneys handle complex federal cases nationwide while maintaining offices in Michigan and other states.

456 E. Milwaukee, Detroit, MI 48202

See all Chapman, Dowling & Mallek office locations