Legal Analysis and Order: Trial Unlikely After Fulton Trump Dismissal

Insights from White Collar Criminal Defense Attorneys Trusted Nationwide

Legal Analysis and Order: Trial Unlikely After Fulton Trump Dismissal

Trial Before Election Unlikely After Fulton Dismissal

 

Link to the Order Dismissing Charges

Scott McAfee dismissed six charges against Trump and 18 charges against others. However, Georgia Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee’s partial dismissal of the indictment still leaves much of the indictment intact.

Bottom line: The order did not recuse Fani Willis, she has the right to appeal. If this is done the trial will not proceed before the election. She may wish to proceed on remaining counts and race to trial but this is not a good strategy. Other legal challenges will prevent a trial from happening before the election.

The defendants challenged the indictment for sufficiency to ensure it met Due Process’s constitutional mandates and the Sixth Amendment. They both require that an indictment be sufficiently detailed to appraise the accused of the nature of the charges, to defend them, and to plead double jeopardy if there was a subsequent prosecution.

The charges were Solicitation of Oath by a Public Officer and Violation of Oath By a Public Officer.

The factual allegations were that the Defendants solicited elected members of the Georgia Senate to violate their oaths of office by requesting them to appoint presidential electors unlawfully. The indictment also alleges that they called a special session to appoint unlawful electors, solicited members of the House of Representatives, violated their oaths of office by imploring them to appoint electors, and requested that the members defy the election results.

The critical flaw in the indictment was that it did not specifically state which oaths the Defendants violated and what actions were taken to break the oath. The indictment does incorporate the Constitution, but this is simply too vague of an allegation.

You can’t indict someone for “violating the constitution”.

The Judge correctly determined that “oath-breaking” charges must be more detailed than simply allegations that an oath was broken due to a violation of the Constitution. More is required.

This ruling will definitely be appealed to the Georgia Supreme Court and will definitely delay the trial unless Fani Willis or successor counsel elects not to appeal.

About the Author

Ronald Chapman II is the founder of Chapman, Dowling & Mallek and a top-rated Michigan federal criminal defense attorney who represents clients in federal courts nationwide. His practice is focused on defending individuals and organizations in complex federal prosecutions, including white-collar criminal matters and healthcare fraud investigations.

Throughout his career, Mr. Chapman has helped clients avoid more than $550 million in potential penalties, primarily in cases involving physicians, healthcare providers, executives, and professionals facing federal charges. He is widely recognized for his work as a Michigan healthcare fraud defense attorney, as well as for his results in white collar criminal defense in Michigan, where cases often involve parallel civil, regulatory, and criminal exposure.

Ronald Chapman II Federal criminal defense Attorney
Tags
Hospice Fraud Defense: CMS and Medicare Target Hospice in National Takedown

Apr-8-2026

Hospice Fraud Defense: CMS and Medicare Target Hospice in National Takedown

Hospice fraud is a serious enforcement priority for Medicare, and federal regulators are under pressure...

What Really Happens at a Federal Criminal Appeal? Inside a Recent Oral Argument

Apr-2-2026

What Really Happens at a Federal Criminal Appeal? Inside a Recent Oral Argument

In federal court, some of the most important battles happen after trial—on appeal—where the focus...

After Dismissal of the Most Serious Counts, Remaining FDA Criminal Charges Result in Mixed Verdict for Dr. Sanjeev Kumar

Jan-9-2026

After Dismissal of the Most Serious Counts, Remaining FDA Criminal Charges Result in Mixed Verdict for Dr. Sanjeev Kumar

Memphis, Tennessee – The verdict returned this week in United States v. Sanjeev Kumar closed...

Dr. Parker’s Pill Mill Case Reaches the Supreme Court: Implications for Healthcare & White Collar Criminal Defense

Dec-31-2025

Dr. Parker’s Pill Mill Case Reaches the Supreme Court: Implications for Healthcare & White Collar Criminal Defense

Dr. Lonnie Joseph Parker, a Texarkana physician, was recently convicted in federal court of unlawfully...

Headquartered in Detroit, Michigan

Serving Clients Nationwide.

Chapman, Dowling & Mallek is headquartered in Detroit, Michigan and represents clients in federal investigations and criminal matters across the United States. Our attorneys handle complex federal cases nationwide while maintaining offices in Michigan and other states.

456 E. Milwaukee, Detroit, MI 48202

See all Chapman, Dowling & Mallek office locations